Codebeamer migration partners

Choose the right migration partner.

A reliable migration is part data engineering, part Codebeamer design, and part organizational change. The right partner connects all three—and makes every important decision reviewable.

Review the checklist

Source + target

Expertise on both sides of the move

Process + data

Technical transfer with operating-model design

Tool + people

Repeatable execution with business adoption

Why specialist support matters

Migration requires translation.

Legacy structures rarely have a one-to-one equivalent in Codebeamer. A specialist partner helps the program decide what to preserve, what to transform, and how to prove the result.

Source-system expertise

The partner must interpret the real source model, customizations, history, relationships, and quality issues—not just export records.

Codebeamer target design

Projects, trackers, workflows, fields, permissions, and traceability need to support the future process rather than recreate the past.

Controlled execution

Repeatable rehearsals, explicit mappings, exception handling, and a practical cutover plan turn migration into an explainable process.

Validation and adoption

Automated reconciliation, business review, evidence capture, training, and post-go-live support protect the result after transfer.

Partner profile

NANGA SYSTEMS

NANGA SYSTEMS lists ALM consulting, Codebeamer implementation, migration, training, and support among its services. That allows one team to take responsibility for understanding the legacy landscape and shaping a usable target.

NANGA SYSTEMS is a PTC partner with experience supporting Codebeamer services and delivery.

Official Codebeamer services profile Publisher contact

Partner profile

At a glance

Partner standing: PTC partner
Codebeamer scope: Consulting, implementation, migration, training, and support
Migration focus: ALM data, target-model design, execution, validation, and adoption
Delivery principle: Tooling where it fits; expert-led decisions throughout

The appropriate delivery model and tooling depend on the source system, version, data model, project scope, and evidence requirements.

Full-lifecycle migration support

A six-stage migration model.

Each stage produces decisions and evidence the customer can review before the program moves forward.

See the source-specific guides

Assess the source

Profile systems, projects, data volumes, custom schemas, integrations, compliance obligations, and the quality of the available content.

Design the target

Translate current processes into a workable Codebeamer architecture with clear decisions for trackers, workflows, permissions, and governance.

Define the translation

Document source-to-target rules for item types, fields, values, users, hierarchy, links, attachments, baselines, and retained history.

Rehearse and refine

Run representative and full-volume trials, resolve exceptions, measure performance, and stabilize the operating plan before cutover.

Validate the result

Reconcile counts and relationships, inspect rich content, test business workflows, and record approvals and accepted exceptions.

Enable the teams

Prepare users, execute cutover, support the first operating period, and transfer the knowledge needed to own the new environment.

Ways to start

Match support to uncertainty.

Some teams need an initial reality check; others need support across the full transition. Start with the smallest engagement that resolves the next important decision.

Understand the landscape

Readiness assessment

A focused discovery of one representative project to expose the target design, mapping, volume, risk, and validation decisions before committing to a program.

Deliver the move

Co-delivered migration

In a co-delivered program, the migration partner works with engineering, quality, IT, and business owners from source assessment and target design through rehearsals, cutover, and stabilization.

Increase repeatability

Tool-enabled execution

Where the source, version, and migration scope fit, purpose-built tooling can support explicit mappings, repeatable runs, and more systematic reconciliation.

About NANGA Migrator

Partner selection checklist

Ask before delivery starts.

A credible migration partner should be able to explain the operating model, not only present a tool or a list of references.

Can the partner explain both the source model and the intended Codebeamer model?

How will mappings, transformation rules, and approved exceptions be documented?

What will be automated, and which decisions still require engineering or quality review?

How are links, hierarchy, attachments, identities, history, and audit evidence validated?

How will rehearsals and reruns maintain stable source-to-target identity and prevent duplicates?

Who owns cutover, user acceptance, training, and the first weeks after go-live?